![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, the grommeting that I stitched into the back of the dress is apparently crappy. I'm very tempted to rip it out, but since I've already taken out the zipper, I'm not sure what to do at this point.
I do have a bright red and lace-trimmed corset, though. It matches the flowers, so putting it over the dress might be an option.
Sigh. I wish I knew more seamstresses. Maybe Aubrey can help me out when we dye the monster.
I do have a bright red and lace-trimmed corset, though. It matches the flowers, so putting it over the dress might be an option.
Sigh. I wish I knew more seamstresses. Maybe Aubrey can help me out when we dye the monster.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 12:00 am (UTC)You might also try stitching around the gromits with needle and thread to 1) hide the metal color and 2) it might give the piece more support. Not sure if that will work though.
Worse case scenario...cut the fabric out near the gromits and sew a new back seam in of something else that you can make work with the final dress color, etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 01:50 pm (UTC)The issue with this method, as I said, is on it's own it may not hold up to a lot of pressure. If it's pulling hard on the laces, you might get puckering at the points of lacing. You could try to mitigate this by stitching down longer strips of the lace-hole-material, so rather than . . . . . . the thread looks more like more like _ _ _ _ _ at the touch points. That should lessen the pucker effect a little. But you could also insert boning just along each side of the opening. That will do a better job of pucker-protection but since the dress is already sewn together, it might be an annoying hand-stitching job to make channels for said boning. If you're up for hand-stitching, this is the method I'd probably go with.
By the way I did finally see pictures and it looks GREAT so far. I'm totally impressed.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 01:06 pm (UTC)